novus actus interveniens cases uk

In hospital the victim had been given anti-biotics to which he was allergic and he had also been given large amounts of intraveneous liquid. Held that X is responsible, acts of A and B do not break the chain of responsibility. Novus actus interveniens. New intervening events can change the ascription of responsibility in legal cases. This is unusual but when it does occur it will result in the accused being acquitted. By Carole C Dastous. In this case, D was liable for mental illness therefore liable for consequences of mental illness - no NAI. For the actus reus of the crime to be established, the defendant must be both the factual and legal cause of that crime. The court held that the judge below had not erred in his approach to causation. Latin for ‘new act intervening’, novus actus interveniens (in a tortious action for negligence) is any intervening act that can sever the legal connection between a defendant’s actions and the harm suffered by the plaintiff, with the effect that the defendant cannot be deemed legally responsible for the plaintiff’s harm. Novus actus interveniens - Designing Buildings Wiki - Share your construction industry knowledge. 12 2020. Causation in law and philosophy : a comparison of solution to cases of Novus actus interveniens . It is rather that A may have to answer for assault, whereas B may have to answer for homicide, in the case that after A assaults C and B takes advantage of C’s state to kill C. The word ‘new’ is used in the sense that it was not the accused’s act – so the original perpetrator may not be responsible. Leading cases in this issue include: McGhee v National Coal Board (1972); Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority (1988); Cutler v Vauxhall Motors (1970); Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services (2002); Jobling v Associated Dairies (1982); Carslogie Steamships Co v Royal Norwegian Navy (1952) and others. and terms. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial. The Court of Appeal further stated that it would be clearly wrong in all the circumstances to hold that the bank's action amounted to a novus actus interveniens, breaking the chain of causation between the defendant's breach and the bank's loss. The new event relieves the defendant from responsibility for the happenings. * It is an act or event that breaks the causal connection between a wrong or crime committed by the defendant and subsequent happenings. For guidance on citing Novus Actus Interveniens (giving attribution as required by the CC BY licence), please see below our recommendation of "Cite this Entry". In the Court of Appeal it was stated that the direct and immediate cause of death was pneumonia. The defendant claimed that the suicide constituted a novus actus interveniens (new act intervening) and that the judge’s direction to the jury that the defendant caused the death if “firstly… [the victim] took that action because of the wounds… secondly… he would not … 12 2020 , "Novus Actus Interveniens" lawi.org.uk. Accesed 12 2020. https://lawi.org.uk/novus-actus-interveniens/, International, 'Novus Actus Interveniens' (lawi.org.uk 2016) accesed 2020 December 20, This entry was last updated: March 8, 2016, Your email address will not be published. If the claimant's actions are deemed reasonable the chain of causation remains in tact and the defendant is … Factual Causation is based on the rule of the ‘but for’ test and legal causation is where the court has to decide if the defendant’s actions were the main cause of death. Entries Sitemap ? ? Intentional Interference With The Person Notes. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Remoteness—'recoverable loss' in breach of contract claims; Remoteness—defaulting party assuming responsibility for the loss suffered It means ‘a new intervening act’. There is scarce case law dealing with intervening acts in the setting of clinical negligence. https://www.hoganlovells.com/en/publications/novus-actus-interveniens Negligent Intervention o The intervention has to be so powerful that it obliterates the other's tort Chapman v. Hearse (Negligence) Novus actus interveniens - rescuer killed by negligence of third party - apportionment of liability - contributory negligence of rescuer pp. "The views expressed in this entry are those of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Lawi Platform. 03, 2016. Legal and Goverment Almanac Novus actus interveniens is a term that is used in the context of causation. P, in charge of the scene, forgot to close the entrance of the tunnel, so ordered C to ride down the tunnel, against the traffic, to close it. , "Novus Actus Interveniens" lawi.org.uk. Novus actus interveniens is important, as this is when an act (either an act of a third party, an act of the victim or an act of 'god') breaks the chain of … An examination of the principles of causation shows that the principles are about making the defendant responsible for all foreseeable loss that he or she has caused. Natural/instinctive intervention o When intervention made in "heat of the moment" then does not break chain of responsibility Novus actus interveniens is a Latin term which means a new intervening act. Intervening acts, or novus actus interveniens, may operate to break the chain of causation between a defendant?s act and the final outcome.The legal impact of an intervening act will depend on the extent to which it is … 117-121. These are the cases of R v Jordan (1956) and R v Smith (1959): There are exceptions, such as in the case of strict liability, but tort liability is about establishing whether anyone is at fault or is to blame. Breaking the chain (or novus actus interveniens, literally new intervening act) refers in English law to the idea that causal connections are deemed to finish. White and Carter (Councils) Ltd. v. McGregor (Anticipatory Breach) Right of Plaintiff to Perform pp.103-112. A more recent version of these Novus Actus Interveniens The question then arises whether the original perpetrator should be responsible for the eventual outcome. There are exceptions, such as in the case of strict liability, but tort liability is about establishing whether anyone is at fault or is to blame. notes – written by Oxford students – is Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our Dawson, Nolan and Walmsley (1985) 81 Cr App R 150, Lanham D. Principles of causation in criminal law’, Chapter 10 in ‘Causation in law and medicine’, Freckleton I. For "Remoteness of vesting" see instead Rule against perpetuities.. Authors Sitemap Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting: How to avoid being held as a "causer" - novus actus interveniens Introduction, * The focus will be a civil, rather than criminal, law perspective. ? The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Tort Law Notes. By using our website you agree to our privacy policy Lamb v Cambden LBC. Novus actus interveniens in medical cases and the egg shell skull rule are considered with case summaries. The defendant bears the burden of proof to show that there was a break in the chain of causation, on the balance of probabilities. The general rule is that whether an act or occurrence is severe enough to constitute a novus actus interveniens depends largely on the circumstances of the case itself. Stuart v. Dundan (Parol Evidence) pp. * The fairness of the rules on causation and remoteness to both parties is illustrated in some relevant cases, such as Doughty v Tuner Manufacturing; Tremain v Pike and Jolley v London Borough of Sutton. The cases fall into three categories. Examines 3 cases of such events, and how civilian jurisprudence of the Province of … (1), In R v Smith the defendant had been involved in a fight with another soldier at their army barracks. In the Supreme Court of South Australia, … This entry about Novus Actus Interveniens has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0) licence, which permits unrestricted use and reproduction, provided the author or authors of the Novus Actus Interveniens entry and the Encyclopedia of Law are in each case credited as the source of the Novus Actus Interveniens entry. National Health Insurance The United Kingdom, Foreign Government Policy On Religious Freedom, In R v Jordan (1956) the defendant stabbed the victim who was admitted to hospital where he died 8 days later. Chapman v Hearse is a significant case in common law related to duty of care, reasonable foreseeability and novus actus interveniens within the tort of negligence. ? The ‘but for’ test is used to help the courts decide on the matter of factual cause. In negligence, the test of causation not only requires that the defendant was the cause in fact, but also requires that the loss or damage sustained by the claimant was not too remote. Metadata for Law, 5 Addington Street, London SE1 7RY, United Kingdom (Southbank), Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress. On the way there the man was dropped two times and on arrival at the medical centre he did not receive the appropriate treatment and the medical officer did not diagnose the seriousness of his injuries and that his lung had been punctured in the attack. There are two cases which probably best illustrate the principles of causation. The ‘but for’ test, as applied by Lord Denning in Cork v Kirby Maclean Ltd (1952), should be covered. 112-117. Labels Sitemap, World Legal Encyclopedia Africa Legal Encyclopedia In effect the courts ask themselves the question ‘but for the the conduct of the accused would the harm complained of occurred?’ If the answer is yes then the defendant should properly be considered responsible. Required fields are marked *, Reach a huge audience writing entries. The law may still want to blame the accused for the way in which he or she did act but the law will also want to hold responsible the others, for the part they played, if they were the main contributor to the outcome. In addition to establishing whether the defendant was responsible for the factual cause of death (‘the but for’ rule) it must be shown that the defendant’s act was a significant cause of the resulting harm i.e. (2). Stephenson LJ o Clearly wanton acts will break the chain of causation and reasonable ones will not The Legal Thesaurus The claimant was originally knocked down by a negligent driver, and was suffering from permanent stiffness in his leg as a result. Novus actus interveniens occurs with such happening when the legal proceeding in the case will stand modified. Specific facts can and often do drastically change legal results. Please note this CC BY licence applies to some textual content of Novus Actus Interveniens, and that some images and other textual or non-textual elements may be covered by special copyright arrangements. Legal Meaning the legal cause. The defendant will be the legal cause of the consequence if his conduct was the 'operating and substantial cause' of that result ( Smith 1959 ). novus actus interveniens. Find out more, Main Sitemap Index The new event relieves the defendant from responsibility for the happenings. The claimant sought damages after suffering … Subsequent negligent conduct is more likely to break the chain of causation than conduct which is not, * Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Tort Law Notes. A break in the chain of causation arises where there is a new intervening act or ‘novus actus interveniens’. An overview of the law relating to causation in criminal liability. made the ordinary course of events become extraordinary o Rescuers/Medics. You should not rely on this information. C obeyed, despite the order and following it being a breach of police standing orders, and C was hit and injured by an incoming car. You should contact a lawyer licensed in your jurisdiction for advice on specific legal problems. The law of remoteness of damage which is illustrated by such cases as Re Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co (1921); Wagon Mound (No 1) (1961); Bradford v Robinson Rentals (1967); Wagon Mound (No 2) (1967). Building the future: The Lawi Project provides individuals and organizations with expertly created and selected information covering many of the areas that will shape our future, including regulation, cybersecurity, human education, the environment, risks, artificial intelligence, social work, behavior, finance, leadership, public policy, and more. The effect of a novus actus interveniens on the defendant’s liability to pay damages in relation to the first act of negligence varies according to the circumstances. Intervening acts may break chain of causation (novus actus interveniens) Recovering loss of chance damages in breach of contract claims; Remoteness—damage suffered attributable to the breach? Oxbridge Notes is a trading name operated by students are currently browsing our notes. This can be seen in Baker v Willoughby [1970] AC 467. Law Abbreviations He appealed claiming that if the victim had received the appropriate medical treatment he would have survived. Web. A defendant is liable for a consequence which is reasonably foreseeable, unless the court finds that the damage was caused by an intervening act by the claimant ("novus actus interveniens"). How to avoid being held as a "causer" - novus actus interveniens Introduction * In certain cases, law will hold that that where on act follows another o The "new intervening act" will be held to be regarded as the true cause of the damage The legal lingo is that it’s a novus actus interveniens (if you’re a Latin fan). Your email address will not be published. Positive acts are more likely to be new causes than omissions o Common sense has to decide these questions Two doctors expressed the opinion that death had not been caused by the stab wound, which was mainly healed at the time of the death, but by the medical treatment the victim received. Dictionaries of Law Because it has broken the "chain of responsibility" (Stapleton) How third parties can break the chain of responsibility, * During the fight the defendant stabbed the other soldier twice with his bayonet, medics were called and took the injured man to the medical station. (2016, 03). privacy policy. Brennan: Tort Law Concentrate 3e Chapter 8: Key facts? The conviction was upheld as the stab wound was the “operating and substantial cause” of death. While some errors might be expected when arriving at an accident scene, o so many errors and departures from common sense These cases reflect the widely held view that the original tortiously inflicted injury carries a foreseeable risk of being exacerbated by subsequent negligent medical treatment, and such treatment will not constitute a novus actus interveniens. A break in the chain of causation arises where there is a new intervening act or ‘novus actus interveniens’. Novus actus [...]. A break in the chain of causation means that when this occurs the courts interpret this to mean that the accused’s conduct was not the cause of the harm or injury. American Legal Encyclopedia Quick Reference [Latin: a new intervening act (or cause)] An act or event that breaks the causal connection between a wrong or crime committed by the defendant and subsequent happenings and therefore relieves the defendant from responsibility for these happenings. The court used the famous case of Environment Agency v Empress Car Company to establish that in fact the chain of causation could not be broken by the voluntary act of the victim as a novus actus interveniens when that action would be an ‘ordinary occurrence’ as opposed to … Beard v. The decision in another English case, Clay v TUI UK Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1177, is useful as it looks at the requirements for novus actus interveniens and provides a useful review of some of the key decisions in this area. In these circumstances it may not be appropriate to find the defendant responsible for the eventual outcome as others have played an important part in bringing this about. ? Asian Legal Encyclopedia The idea is not that the application of the doctrine of novus actus interveniens may result in attributing say 25% responsibility to A and 75% responsibility to B. Even if the defendant can be shown to have acted negligently, there will be no liability if some new intervening act breaks the chain of causation between that negligence and the loss or damage sustained by the claimant . Legal Documents of the 20th Century Novus Actus Interveniens lawi.org.uk Retrieved 12, 2020, from https://lawi.org.uk/novus-actus-interveniens/, 03 2016. The case concerned three parties; Chapman who drove negligently, Dr Cherry who assisted him on the side of the road, and Hearse who, in driving negligently, killed Dr Cherry while he was assisting Chapman. The soldier died and the defendant was convicted of murder. Leading cases in this issue include: McGhee v National Coal Board (1972); Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority (1988); Cutler v Vauxhall Motors (1970); Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services (2002); Jobling v Associated Dairies (1982); Carslogie Steamships Co v Royal Norwegi… Novus actus interveniens in medical negligence cases is when an unforeseeable event occurs after a neglectful act which intervenes and worsens the effects. Legal Definitions A chain of causation is sometimes referred to when the defendant triggers a series of events involving others who may also contribute to the harm or injury of the victim. ", Novus Actus Interveniens in United Kingdom, Rules on causation and remoteness of damage in tort, A break in the chain of causation arises where there is a new intervening act or ‘novus actus interveniens’. ? Including the but for test of factual causation and legal causation. available here. Novus actus interveniens occurs with such happening when the legal proceeding in the case will stand modified. European Legal Encyclopedia X throws lit firework into market, A throws it to B, B throws it to C, who is hit and injured. Categories Sitemap * Abstract. Australian Legal Encyclopedia The court held that the defendant was not liable for the death. Legal Books of the 19th Century In English law, remoteness is a set of rules in both tort and contract, which limits the amount of compensatory damages for a wrong. This site is educational information based. Pages Sitemap Knightly v Johns [1982]: D was involved in a serious road accident at the end of the tunnel. It's a new intervening act. Duty Of Care, Omissions, Public Authorities, Nervous Shock, Wrongful Conceptions Notes, Economic Loss Caused By Negligent Activities Notes, Economic Loss Caused By Negligent Misstatements And Services Notes, How Is A Breach Of The Duty Of Care Established Notes, Intentional Interference With The Person Notes, Ministry Of Defence V Ab And Others Notes, Nature Of The Duty To Lawful Visitors Notes, Omissions And Liability Of Public Authorities Theory Notes, Private Nuisance, Public Nuisance, And Rylands V Fletcher Liability Notes, Product Liability, Employer Liability, Vicarious Liability Notes, Rylands V Fletcher Rule And Application Notes, Smith V Chief Constable Sussex Police Notes, Tort Law Condensed Revision Tables Notes, Vi. Approach to novus actus interveniens (Court of Appeal) In Clay v Tui UK Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1177, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal of a decision dismissing a claim for damages against a travel company after a holidaymaker fell from a hotel balcony and fractured his skull. At the time of his death the stab wounds were starting to heal. The matter of a causal link is related to the chain of causation and any new or intervening act (novus actus interveniens). The claimant’s loss may be increased either due to an act of the claimant him/herself, a third party or by an act of nature. Novus actus interveniens - Act of the claimant Where the new intervening act is that of the claimant, the test is whether the claimant acted reasonably in the circumstances . We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Leading cases include the following: Cutler v Vauxhall Motors ( 1970); Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority (1988); McGhee v National Coal Board (1972);Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services (2002); Jobling v Associated Dairies (1982); Carslogie Steamship Co v Royal Norwegian Navy (1952) and others. The ‘but for’ test, as applied by Lord Denning in Cork v Kirby Maclean Ltd (1952), should be covered. This monograph examines on a comparative basis how the courts in the leading common law jurisdictions of the United Kingdom, the United States of America, Canada, Australia and New Zealand have applied novus actus interveniens in actions in tort. But there are plenty of acts inbetween o The question to be asked is whether the whole sequence of events is the natural and probable consequence of D's negligence Here, too much happened, too much went wrong, the chapter of accidents, was here too long and varied, * Novus actus interveniens is a Latin term which means a new intervening act. This is known as “breaking the chain of causation” and often means the defendant will not be found liable – even if it can be proved that they acted negligently. ©2010-2020 Oxbridge Notes. In certain cases, law will hold that that where on act follows another o The "new intervening act" will be held to be regarded as the true cause of the damage E.g. In addressing novus actus interveniens, the court in Khaliq had relied on a passage in The Oropesa P 32. ? It is an act or event that breaks the causal connection between a wrong or crime committed by the defendant and subsequent happenings. And Mendelson D. (Ed) 2002 Dartmouth Publishing Company, Aldershot England, R V HM Coroner for Exeter and East Devon; ex parte Palmer (unreported Court of Appeal 10/12/1997), - Page Visits in the past year: 12,537,600. lawi.org.uk, 03 2016. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. The action of a third party must at least have been something very likely to happen if it is not to be regarded as novus actus interveniens breaking the chain of causation. In this instance, the Judge was of the view that the great and obvious danger involved in standing on the ledge outweighed the inconvenience faced by the family. Jack Kinsella. The factual and legal cause of that crime 12, 2020, from:... That breaks the causal connection between a wrong or crime committed by the defendant from responsibility the... Service via our online form should be responsible for the actus reus of the author/s and do not the! Chain of causation arises where there is scarce case law dealing with acts. And the egg shell skull rule are considered with case summaries novus actus interveniens cases uk do! The conviction was upheld as the stab wound was the “ operating and substantial cause ” of death pneumonia... To our privacy policy and terms you should contact a lawyer licensed in your jurisdiction for advice specific! Serious road accident at the end of the Lawi Platform >, `` novus actus interveniens ) ascription of in. A civil, rather than criminal, law perspective ) Right of Plaintiff to Perform pp.103-112 (... Of murder a new intervening act then arises whether the original perpetrator should be responsible for the.. Taken from our Tort law Notes market, a throws it to,... The causal connection between a wrong or crime committed by the defendant was not liable for the happenings clinical! In a serious road accident at the time of his death the stab wounds were starting to heal operating! * held that x is responsible, acts of a and B do not reflect. Of clinical negligence our Tort law Notes it does occur it will result the. One question to LexisAsk during the length of the author/s and do not necessarily the. Beard v. causation in law and philosophy: a comparison of solution to cases of actus. Time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason LexisPSL services please customer. Causation and legal cause of that crime terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a,! And often do drastically change legal results result in the case will modified. Lawi.Org.Uk Retrieved 12, 2020, from https: //lawi.org.uk/novus-actus-interveniens/ >, `` novus actus interveniens the. Extract of the tunnel a result in addressing novus actus interveniens ) such happening the... Was upheld as the stab wounds were starting to heal will be a civil, rather than criminal law... Breaks the causal connection between a wrong or crime committed by the defendant had been involved in a road. Addressing novus actus interveniens ’ rule are considered with case summaries contact lawyer... Of Plaintiff to Perform pp.103-112 reasonable ones will not and philosophy: comparison... Free trials are only available to individuals based in the Oropesa P 32. novus interveniens... Will break the chain of causation made the ordinary course of events become extraordinary Rescuers/Medics... Be so powerful that it obliterates the other 's Tort of intraveneous.. Do drastically change legal results novus actus interveniens would have survived from responsibility for death... Law Notes relied on novus actus interveniens cases uk passage in the chain of causation and any new intervening. Or crime committed by the defendant must be both the factual and legal cause of crime... From permanent stiffness in his approach to causation in criminal liability can and often do drastically legal! It obliterates the other 's Tort B throws it to C, who is hit and injured ``... This is unusual but when it does occur it will result in the chain causation. For the death law relating to causation in criminal liability on a passage in the of. Above, taken from our Tort law Notes to LexisAsk during the length of the author/s and do necessarily! Not liable for the actus reus of the law relating to causation in law philosophy. The egg shell skull rule are considered with case summaries his approach to causation in law and:! V Johns [ 1982 ]: D was involved in a fight with another soldier their... You agree to our privacy policy and terms was originally knocked down by a negligent driver, was. Will be a civil, rather than criminal, law perspective you agree to our privacy policy and terms is! In your jurisdiction for advice on specific legal problems R v Smith the defendant was convicted murder. Acts of a and B do not necessarily reflect the views expressed in this entry those. Following is a new intervening act or event that breaks the causal connection a. Are those of the law relating to causation in law and philosophy: a comparison of solution to of!, B throws it to C, who is hit and injured Tort law Notes made ordinary. The chain of responsibility in legal cases appropriate medical treatment he would have survived often do drastically change results! Knightly v Johns [ 1982 ]: D was involved in a with. In R v Smith the defendant had been given anti-biotics to which he was and. 'S Tort hit and injured one question to LexisAsk during the length the! Lawyer licensed in your jurisdiction for advice on specific legal problems decide not to give a trial for... O Rescuers/Medics market, a throws it to B, B throws it to B B! ( 1 ), in R v Smith the defendant and subsequent happenings that! 3E Chapter 8: Key facts of clinical negligence to the chain causation. Of that crime has to be established, the court held that the direct and immediate cause of was. Had received the appropriate medical treatment he would have survived marked *, Reach a huge audience writing entries died! Stated that the judge below had not erred in his leg as a.! Are only available to individuals based in the court of Appeal it was stated the... Of his death the stab wounds were starting to heal clinical negligence responsible acts... Shell skull rule are considered with case summaries was upheld as the stab wound the... Anticipatory Breach ) Right of Plaintiff to Perform pp.103-112 do not necessarily reflect the views expressed in this entry those! Serious road accident at the end of the law relating to causation law... Actus reus of the law relating to causation a serious road accident at the time of his death stab. Where there is a Latin term which means a new intervening act have survived extraordinary Rescuers/Medics... Length of the trial a causal link is related to the chain of responsibility – written by Oxford –! Not liable for the happenings civil, rather than criminal, law.... Should be responsible for the happenings the original perpetrator should be responsible for the happenings is scarce law. Students – is available here this can be seen in Baker v Willoughby [ 1970 ] AC 467 licensed your... Be both the factual and legal causation this trial at any time or decide not to a! Entry are those of the crime to be established, the defendant had been in... A trial, for any reason an act or event that breaks the causal connection between a or... Dealing with intervening acts in the case will stand modified accident at time. This can be seen in Baker v Willoughby [ 1970 ] AC 467 in. Shell skull rule are considered with case summaries the victim had received the appropriate medical novus actus interveniens cases uk would! It does occur it will result novus actus interveniens cases uk the accused being acquitted these Notes or essay plans and in... Crime committed by the defendant was convicted of murder Lawi Platform leg as a result a wrong crime... Accused being acquitted trading name operated by Jack Kinsella acts of a and B do not break chain... Legal causation of clinical negligence 12, 2020, from https: //lawi.org.uk/novus-actus-interveniens/ >, `` novus interveniens. >, `` novus actus interveniens occurs with such happening when the proceeding... Died and the defendant from responsibility for the eventual outcome scarce case law dealing with intervening acts in context! Where there is scarce case law dealing with intervening acts in the accused being acquitted trials only... New or intervening act means a new intervening act oxbridge Notes is a new intervening act or event breaks. A more accessble plain text extract of the author/s and do not break the chain of in... Legal cases by the defendant from responsibility for the actus reus of the crime to so! Can and often do drastically change legal results we may terminate this trial at any time or decide not give.

Center Harbor Boat Launch, Punch Bowl Crosthwaite Sunday Lunch, Jeopardy Meaning In Urdu, Dandy Topsoil Calculator, Is Germiston Safe, Nc Section 8 Voucher Amounts, Thompson Falls Nh, Ambala To Muzaffarnagar Train, Common Vodka Additives,